Posts Tagged ‘mary halvorson’

The Genre Bending of Rare Noise Records

September 3, 2014 2 comments

The handful releases from Rare Noise records I’ve received in the last couple years has presented a problem for organizing my music collection: as I sort albums into loosely defined genres I can’t figure out where in the hell to put them. Most of Rare Noise’s output that I’ve heard contains a mix of so many influences and genres that it’s really doesn’t make much sense to file them under any genre. The catalog is full of combinations and takes on metal, prog, electronica, musique concrete, free jazz, straightahead jazz, new/contemporary music, and so on. To get out of trying to best organize them, I decided the best solution would be to put them together. And so they all reside together on the same shelf. While sure, I’ve got plenty of albums that defy genre that have found homes, but putting all the Rare Noise releases together makes them easier to find.

These albums’ resistance to classification, as manifested in my organizational conundrum, is pretty telling as to what Rare Noise produces. While I don’t care for everything the label puts out, there’s several albums I really dig, all of which bend, or flat out ignore, genre conventions.  Here’s the lowdown on a few of them I really enjoy.

That_The_Days_Go_53bfc0785c4cdThat the Days Go by and Never Come Again, by Indigo Mist, is an Ellington tribute unlike any I’ve heard. The group consists of trumpeter Cuong Vu, pianist Richard Karpen, bassist Luke Berman, frequent Vu collaborator drummer Ted Poor, and several folks on live electronics. Four of the ten cuts are from Duke’s book: Strayhorn’s “A Flower is a Lovesome Thing” and “Lush Life,” and Ellington’s standards “Mood Indigo” and “In A Sentimental Mood.” The tracks all segue, so as to make one long suite, and they vary in instrumentation, texture, dynamics, and mood. It’s also not always clear when one song begins and the other ends, and when combined with the free flowing and organic way in which the music grows, the album takes the listener on a winding journey. Along the way one encounters Karpen’s thundering left hand piano booms and dissonant clusters, a lengthy drum solo from Poor that dances around the stereo field, brief outputs of random sine waves, a piece that straightforwardly touches on swing and bebop before going sideways, and Vu’s plaintive recitations of “A Flower Is a Lovesome Thing” and “In A Sentimental Mood” wafting through the mist. That the Days Go by and Never Come Again is a gorgeous, far out, haunting, and evocative album. In a word: special.

2.-Plymouth_Cover_600600_72dpiOne of my favorite albums of 2014 so far is the self titled album from Plymouth. This is a heavy album that imposes its will. The quintet includes Jamie Saft on organs, echoplex and Rhodes, guitarists Joe Morris and Mary Halvorson, Chris Lightcap on electric bass, and drummer Gerald Cleaver. The three tracks on this beast are long – the “short” one (“Plimouth”) [sic] is thirteen minutes, the long one (“Standish”) almost thirty. Each cut follows roughly the same narrative arc: a relatively quiet and sparse beginning that is followed by a slow buildup in intensity, dynamics and polyphonic textures, and then concluding with a gradual decline.  The buildup is not constant, however, as the players weave in and out of each other, contributing a new chord, huge swath of sound, short-lived rhythmic gesture, or melody. The sonic pallet contains a little bit of everything: spacey ’70s fusion, driving hard rock, crunching distortion, huge organ chords, and angular and penetrating guitar lines. Don’t bother looking for catchy tunes or hummable melodies. There are no stars here, as no player stands above the rest – just a guitar flourish from Morris or Halvorson here, a keyboard or drum kit intervention there. Listening to Plymouth’s music is almost like being able to watch the entire lifespan of a glacier: seeing it form, watching it gorge its way through a mountain, witness subsequent fall into the sea, and then being left to consider its power and complexity.

spA second Saft-involved project is Slobber Pup, which released Black Aces in June 2013. Pretty much all you need to know about this album can be found in the title of the disc’s final track: “Taint of Satan.” Yup, Black Aces is Hard. Like Plymouth, this album also features Joe Morris. The quartet is rounded out by bassist Trevor Dunn-who was a member of The Melvins-and drummer Balazs Pandi, who played with Merzbow. [Morris and Pandi can be heard on the avant-garde free jazz album by tenor saxophonist Ivo Perelman on Rare Noise entitled One.] Although Slobber Pup’s instrumentation is similar to Plymouth’s (only one guitar here instead of two) they’ve got a completely different sound. As opposed to Plymouth, there is a whole lot of space for soloists to stretch out. The members of Slobber Pup don’t take a whole lot of time to get started – they punch you in the teeth just about from the word go. Black Aces opens with the 27 minute long “Accuser,” and after a roughly two minute introduction in which Morris and Saft test the waters it’s on, as Morris unleashes some serious and lengthy shredding. In fact, the tune is basically one long vehicle for Morris, who navigates the changing grooves and textures by moving from long single note lines, to waves of distortion laden sustained or strummed chords. The last few minutes is a dark maelstrom of drums, organ chords, fuzzy guitar, and Dunn’s penetrating solo bass lines. Pandi is an absolute beast throughout the entire record; he is almost unbelievably active, and his drums thud with unwavering strength and authority. Check out the title track especially, which features some massive organ playing by Saft, to see what I mean. Pandi gives the music its drive and the group’s stomp on your neck swagger.  He is, like Slobber Pup as a whole, a force to be reckoned with.

mumpbeakProg fans would do well to check out the self titled album from 2013 by Mumpbeak. The group is led by keyboardist Roy Powell, and as is the case with many of Rare Noise’s releases, it includes contributions by heavy hitters from other prominent groups. King Crimson alum and bassist Tony Levin sits in on one cut, and King Crimson’s Pat Mastelotto holds the group’s drum chair. The album also features bassist and producer Bill Laswell.  Powell hitched a complex set of pedals to his Hohner Clavinet, teamed up with a few electric bassists, and proceeded to record seven tracks that are venues for him to explore his instrument’s sonic possibilities, get inside the spaces provided by the wide variety of grooves and tempos, and generally rock out.  As is the case with prog, mixed meter and tricky rhythms abound. The compositions aren’t based around tunes; rather, they are grounded by Mastelotto’s drum patterns, melodic ostinatos, and particular colors and moods. Most of the record features simultaneous bassists, and the ways Powell uses his clavinet’s effects to sound like a variety of guitars and keyboards makes it seem like there are multiple soloists, which gives the album a range of timbres, new sounds, and ideas to check out. Mumpbeak surely isn’t for everyone, but it’s an intriguing, dark, ominous, and stimulating take on prog and other forms of improvisation-heavy instrumental rock.



My Thoughts on this Year’s Jazz Grammy Nominations

February 4, 2011 1 comment

Well, the Grammy Awards are just under 10 days away, and if you’re like me you’re quite underwhelmed with a bulk of the jazz nominations this year.  I’d argue that institutions like the Grammys (although the jazz awards are not aired on the broadcast – which I won’t be watching) have a canonizing effect (especially for the jazz lay person), just like the numerous Top 10 lists, record reviews, polls, etc., do.  I therefore don’t take the nominations that lightly.  So here are some thoughts on this year’s nominees in no particular order:

-Best solo:  this is a stupid category, no matter who wins, even if it’s my favorite player.  There were around 500 records listed on this year’s Village Voice poll, which I’m sure each contained at least a dozen, if not dozens of solos.  So trying to pick one solo out of those thousands and thousands of solos is just dumb.  And one of my ongoing interests is how do people decide what “best” means?  Apparently, based on what is nominated for “best solo” this year, it’s the best solos from players people who have heard of: Wynton Marsalis, Keith Jarrett, Hank Jones (I’m assuming the Grammy folks threw him a bone since he recently passed away, I call it the Downbeat reader’s poll effect, which I assume means Lee Konitz won’t make the DB Hall of Fame until he dies), and Herbie Hancock (can somebody else besides Hancock please win some Grammys?).  And Alan Broadbent was nominated (extra points if you know where he’s from).  Broadbent is a great player, but really, Alan Broadbent? His nomination is completely random, and not exactly the name his fellow nominees are.  To be fair, I’ve only heard Jarrett’s solo out of those nominated, which comes from his recent record with Charlie Haden.  But I’m not sure how it’s any better than the Mary Halvorson solo I’m listening to right now.  Or any other solo I’ll probably hear today.  So I will pay absolutely no attention to who wins this category.  (BTW, if Jon Irabagon doesn’t win, or even nominated, for his epic 78 solo on his new record Foxy, I will scratch my head in disbelief).

Best Large Ensemble Record: At least the Vince Mendoza/John Scofield/Metropole Orchestra record got nominated.  I don’t know what the Grammy counts as being a “large” ensemble, but the fact that Dave Holland’s Octet was nominated leads me to believe that any group with more than a two-horn front line counts as “large.”  So Holland’s (he’s yet another big name to get nominated) nomination takes away from other large ensemble records which deserved to be nominated.  Dan Gailey’s What Did You Dream? comes to mind, and I’ve heard that there was a killing Dave Douglas record with Jim McNeely and the Frankfurt Big Band out (Douglas puts out so many albums it’s hard to keep track of them).  Way to go Grammy committee for nominating an 8 piece for “large ensemble.”  Obviously not what I would have done.

-Best New Artist (all categories): this is a stupid category as well, not because there aren’t folks who put out great music, but the nominations usually show how not-hip the committee is.  For example, Esperanza Spalding is nominated this year – which is awesome, but considering she just put out her third record, she’s not exactly new, except for those people who don’t know much.  I hope she wins, although she probably won’t.

-Best Traditional Blues Record: Cyndi Lauper?  Really?  There weren’t some other folks who have spent their whole lives playing “traditional” blues who put out a good album?  To be fair, I saw Lauper at an in-store concert she played at the record store I worked at in Portland, and she is a great musician.  I also haven’t heard the record, so take my thoughts with a few grains of salt.  But just seeing her name among the nominees for best traditional blues record – that’s a mind bender right there.

And the nominating period….the nominating period is from September 1 to August 31.  So for this year’s awards it means albums from 9/1/09 through 8/31/10 are eligible.  That would explain why Darcy James Argue’s Infernal Machines and Vijay Iyer’s Historicity (ok, gotta give props to the Grammy folks for those two – pretty hip choices, and Iyer deserves to win) are both nominated, even though their records are over a year old.  So if you were wondering why seemingly not-that-recent albums are nominated, there you go.

So there you go, my thoughts on this year’s jazz Grammy nominations.  You might disagree, but hey, that’s why we talk about music.

Mary Halvorson’s New Record

February 4, 2011 1 comment

Hey everybody, just a quick shout out to let you know I just downloaded the new record from guitarist Mary Halvorson from Amazon for $5.34.  It’s called Electric Fruit and it features Peter Evans on trumpet and Weasel Walter on drums and percussion.  It’s more than worth the super cheap price (although I always prefer to own the actual album with the art and notes and all that, but sometimes price dictates what form I buy the record in). It’s awesome, crunchy, out there contemporary free jazz at it’s finest, and all three musicians are highly adept at listening to each other and adapting their ideas and direction at will.  They always seem to finish each others’ sentences (terrible cliche I know).  I’m giving Electric Fruit my first listen-to now, and I’m struck by how well Evans’ trumpet timbre and ideas match Halvorson’s.  And Walter gives a similar vibe on drums to folks like Paul Motian and Han Bennink: more emphasis on color and texture than on time and meter.   As my mom would say: “it’s train wreck music”; thus, it’s not for the faint of heart.  It’s a must have for all Halvorson fans (people who dislike her playing and say she has no technique will certainly hate this record), and like I keep saying: Halvorson rocks harder than Metallica ever did (anybody else feel like Metallica was super-fake, all fluff and no chicken, a simulacrum of hard rock, if you will?).  Electric Fruit is good stuff.

Um….it’s not their second record as a leader. Do your homework.

…haven’t written in a while, time to shake off the rust…..

When Esperanza Spalding’s third album as a leader dropped a few weeks back I read a ton of interviews, short reviews, album descriptions, etc. that said Chamber Music Society (hereafter CMS) was her “sophomore” album. 

BTW, I hate it when people describe someone’s second album as their “sophomore” record.  Ugh, can we please think of another word?  Oh, and the only other thing worse than that are the inevitable questions: “will this record be a sophomore slump?” Plain lazy. 

Anyways, seems like the writers who think CMS is Spalding’s second record are not doing their homework.  Cause it’s not her second record, it’s her third.  Apparently her first, Junjo, doesn’t exist.  But it does, cause I have it, and it’s killing.

And this isn’t the only other recent example.  In this week’s Helping Friendly (yo Phish phans) jazz email from NPR they are giving out free streaming of way-left-of-center guitarist Mary Halvorson’s so called “second” album as a leader, Saturn Sings, before it is released on October 5. 

I’m listening to it right now and it is slamming, and out, and crunchy, and soooo good, which means I’m gonna have to buy it, dammit.  Go here to listen to the record.

Once again, the writer, in this case Lars Gotrich, has forgotten, or never knew, about another previous Halvorson-led date besides the also “slamming, and out, and crunchy” Dragon’s Head.  Turns out there’s another Halvorson record on the oft-forgot hatOLOGY label called Cracklenob.  And another one called Calling All Portraits.  And another one she co-led with violinist Jessica Pavone: it’s called Thin Air.  And another one with Pavone called On and Off.

So jazz writers, and I guess this applies to music writers in general, please check your facts regarding, well…not just everything, but at least how many records a musician has put out.  Don’t just say it’s “their sophomore release” because you only know about one other record from them. 

And this doesn’t take any kind of miraculous knowledge about every artist you write about – because God knows I end up having to write about musicians I’ve never heard of before.  What it takes is an Amazon search, which assuming you have a decent internet connection, should take you approximately 10 seconds.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 996 other followers